Hi, I read RFC195 suggesting to drop 'chop' and go with 'chomp'. What does 'chop' have anything to do with 'chomp'? I'm totally oppose to that. Consider: my $s; map { /\S/ && $s .= "$_ " } split(/\s+/,@_); chop($s); return $s; Thanks, Marc K.
- Re: RFC195: Do not remove 'chop' PLEASE! root
- Re: RFC195: Do not remove 'chop' PLEASE! Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC195: Do not remove 'chop' PLEASE! abigail
- Re: RFC195: Do not remove 'chop' PLEASE! Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC195: Do not remove 'chop' PLEASE! abigail
- Re: RFC195: Do not remove 'chop' PLEASE! Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC195: Do not remove 'chop' PLEASE! Uri Guttman
- Re: RFC195: Do not remove 'chop' PLEASE! Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC195: Do not remove 'chop' PLEASE! Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC195: Do not remove 'chop' PLEASE! John Porter