Dan Sugalski wrote: > > Well, maybe we can do it in befunge instead. No, you're getting confused. We'd like perl at the *user code level* to look like intercal and befunge. (Hmm... wonder what a "come from" operator in befunge would look like...) But we'll probably *implement* perl in Ada, of course. -- John Porter Standard emoticons apply.
- Re: What will the Perl6 code name be? Dan Sugalski
- Re: What will the Perl6 code name be? Simon Cozens
- Re: What will the Perl6 code name be? Dan Sugalski
- Re: What will the Perl6 code name be? Simon Cozens
- Re: What will the Perl6 code name be? Peter Scott
- Re: What will the Perl6 code name be? Simon Cozens
- Re: What will the Perl6 code name be? Dan Sugalski
- Re: What will the Perl6 code name be? Nicholas Clark
- Re: What will the Perl6 code name be? Philip Newton
- Re: What will the Perl6 code name be? Peter Scott
- Re: What will the Perl6 code name be? John Porter
- Re: What will the Perl6 code name be? Simon Cozens
- Re: What will the Perl6 code name be? John Porter
- Re: What will the Perl6 code name be? Uri Guttman
- Re: What will the Perl6 code name be? Simon Cozens
- TIL redux (was Re: What will the Perl6 code name be?) Uri Guttman
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What will the Perl6 code name ... Adam Turoff
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What will the Perl6 code name ... Simon Cozens
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What will the Perl6 code name ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What will the Perl6 code name ... Uri Guttman
- Re: TIL redux (was Re: What will the Perl6 code name ... Ariel Scolnicov