On Thu, 05 Oct 2000 11:08:00 -0700, Peter Scott wrote: >May I point out that COBOL was designed by a committee. That ain't bad enough. Let me point out that we don't need another Ada or PL/1. -- Bart.
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for documentat... Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for docume... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for do... Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for documentation i... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for documentat... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for docume... Nicholas Clark
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for do... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML fo... Uri Guttman
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for docume... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for do... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for do... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for do... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML fo... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use X... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use X... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use X... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for documentat... Adam Turoff