> I haven't got around to RFCing the more generic version (that all attributes > are inherited inside nested data types), but that would certainly be a nice > approach. RFC 337...the new version I just sent in says: This would allow those who want to to warp Perl OO into Java or Python or C++ without these features having to be either widely used or embedded in core. A base class could simply define attribute handlers which other classes could then inherit from. Attributes would be inherited just like subs. Although I didn't mention the implicit autoviv inheritance idea - that's cool, though. It's something that probably should have gone into RFC 279, actually. Sigh. Too many RFC's. -Nate (who will shortly, per the suggestion of Jeremy, be checking himself into the Betty Ford RFC Recovery Program)
- Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $[ alone. Nicholas Clark
- Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $[ alone. Nicholas Clark
- Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $[ alone. Bart Lateur
- Variable attributes (was Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $[... John Porter
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC 355 (v1) ... Peter Scott
- Variable attributes - Object-oriented John Porter
- Re: Variable attributes - Object-orie... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Variable attributes - Object-orie... Peter Scott
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC 355 (... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC ... Peter Scott
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC ... Peter Scott
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC ... Peter Scott
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC ... Peter Scott
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re: RFC ... Nathan Wiger