On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 12:18:22PM -0400, Buddha Buck wrote: > > Do you expect that your 7 retracted RFCs to be looked at by future > developers? Even if they had good, but unpopular, points to make? Or do > you expect that once retracted, they will be ignored? Mostly. There are some core developers we have yet to meet, and some core developers who have yet to look at the Perl sources. For future contributors, retracted RFCs demonstrate why some ideas are incredibly unperlish. And that helps keep Perl perlish, instead of adopting every feature from every other language out there simply because they exist. Z.
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for documentation i... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for documentat... Simon Cozens
- one major flaw in the RFC processn Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for documentat... Buddha Buck
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for docume... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for do... Frank Tobin
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for do... Frank Tobin
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for docume... Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for documentat... Robin Berjon
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for documentat... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for docume... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for do... Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML fo... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use X... Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for docume... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML for do... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use XML fo... Nicholas Clark
- Re: RFC 357 (v2) Perl should use X... Dan Sugalski