On 30 Sep 2000 20:13:55 -0000, Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote: >But setting $[ = 1 is the mathematically correct method for >array addressing and makes it easier for ordinary mortals to do >basic tasks with C<substr()>, array addressing and the like. I sure don't want the fact that a scripter decides to change $[, make used modules fail, because the module's author didn't anticipate that. Does this not imply that $[ should become lexically scoped? -- Bart.
- RFC 355 (v1) Leave $[ alone. Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $[ alone. Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $[ alone. Nicholas Clark
- Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $[ alone. Nicholas Clark
- Re: RFC 355 (v1) Leave $[ alone. Bart Lateur
- Variable attributes (was Re: RFC 355 ... John Porter
- Re: Variable attributes (was Re:... Peter Scott
- Variable attributes - Object... John Porter
- Re: Variable attributes ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Variable attributes ... Peter Scott
- Re: Variable attributes (was... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Variable attributes ... Jeremy Howard