Re: RFC 351 (v1) Beyond the amnesic eval

[Nathan Wiger]

> =head1 ABSTRACT
> 
> An unscoped eval is needed. It is part of the necessary steps to
> make Perl palatable as an interactive shell.

I agree with Michael that the syntax is not suitable. If it's a separate
function, then it needs to be a \w+ name.

You should check out RFC 339 - it talks about a very similar extension
to eval. The two might be able to be integrated.

-Nate