This RFC still has silly language that discounts what
has been said before.
1) It calls
uc($a) eq uc($b)
"ugly", despite their being completely intuitive and legible
to even the uninitiated.
2) It then proposes "eq/i" without the least blush, despite
how incredibly ugly and non-intuitive and, if I may,
syntactically perverse such a notion is.
--tom
Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com
This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If
verification is required please request a hard-copy version. This
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or
related financial instruments.
