> On the matter of gcos or gecos, and passwd or pw_passwd, and all > that noise, please consult the User::pwent manpage. > There's no reason for all those noisy bits. Since the standard function provides those noisy bits, this proposal names them. > In fact, there had jolly well better be a VERY good reason not to > follow my Class::Struct'd modules' name choices, since they were > chosen to nonshock systems programmers already, and because they've > got precedent. And since I worked from the precedent, the names came out the same. Even though I never looked at the modules. :-) I've added the complete module list to the REFERENCES section of the RFC. Damian
