Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 03:49:10PM +0100, Tom Christiansen wrote: > > Don't change "use less" to "use optimize". We don't > > need to ruin the cuteness. > > "use less 'rolled_loops';" sounds really weird. We obviously need to introduce a synonymous C<use fewer 'rolled_loops'> for when we want to be grammatically correct. Or am I just being silly now? -- piers
- Re: RFC 303 (v1) Keep C<use less>, but make it work... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 303 (v1) Keep C<use less>, but make it... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 303 (v1) Keep C<use less>, but mak... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 303 (v1) Keep C<use less>, but... John Porter
- Re: RFC 303 (v1) Keep C<use less>,... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 303 (v1) Keep C<use less... John Porter
- Re: RFC 303 (v1) Keep C<use less>, but... Alan Gutierrez
- Re: RFC 303 (v1) Keep C<use less>,... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 303 (v1) Keep C<use less>,... Piers Cawley