Sounds good. Here's some stuff we had discussed on it:
http://www.mail-archive.com/perl6-language@perl.org/msg03484.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/perl6-language@perl.org/msg03487.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/perl6-language@perl.org/msg03488.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/perl6-language@perl.org/msg03500.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/perl6-language@perl.org/msg03532.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/perl6-language@perl.org/msg03536.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/perl6-language@perl.org/msg03537.html
I believe this ties in with RFC 123 on lazy evaluation as well,
basically just making lazy evaluation the default for functions where it
makes sense to. As one of the emails notes, I was going to RFC something
like this, but never found the time (and still haven't). :-(
-Nate
Adam Turoff wrote:
>
> I plan to offer a more formal RFC of this idea.
>
> Z.
>
> =item perl6storm #0000
>
> This:
>
> ($a,$b) = <FH>;
>
> should not drain whole ahndle on known LHS count, to rescue
>
> my($x) = <FH>;
