Nathan Wiger wrote:
> Jeremy Howard wrote:
> >
> > Good question. I haven't tackled this in RFC 83, because it is a more
> > general question about attribute syntax. We don't really have a good
> > attribute syntax RFC yet, although Nate threw up some ideas a couple of
days
> > ago. Is someone interested in whipping up an RFC that combines Nate's
> > suggestions with clarification of issues such as this?
>
> Nate is! ;-)
>
> I'm on it, should be out today...
>
Excellent! I thought you were in the RFC recovery program--but you couldn't
resist writing 'just one more', could you? ;-)
