a) I do not subscribe to Perl6 lists, so please consider including me
on the Cc lines;
b)
==================================================================
* From: Nathan Wiger
> There are several proposals to switch the meaning of C<f($arg)>
basing on
> the whether $arg is an array reference or not. For example, it is
tempting
> to allow C<$array[[2,3]]> denote the same as C<$array[2][3]>.
I know I'd personally appreciate at least a list of those RFCs that do
what you're talking about in the REFERENCES section. Which ones are
you referring to
> and why do feel they are bad?
==================================================================
As I said: those which blah-blah-blah (too many of them... What I
remember now is [[]] syntax and {{}} syntax for something, and most of
multidimensional RFC).
And I explained why they should not be implemented in my RFC.
Hope this helps,
Ilya
