Re: RFC 103 (v2) Fix C<$pkg::$var> precedence issues with parsing of C<::>

[Bart Lateur]

On Sat, 16 Sep 2000 19:26:38 -0700, Nathan Wiger wrote:

>My point was more should that be
>
>   'Class'->name
>
>or 
>
>   Class()->name

There now is another RFC about this: RFC 244. How odd, v1 dates from the
same day as your post. But I think Tom Christiansen has brought this up
before.

The idea there is that -> would do the same kind of LHS quoting as =>,
so that Class->name would *always* be interpreted as 'Class'->name and
never as Class()->name.

-- 
        Bart.