On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Bart Lateur wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2000 18:14:49 -0400, Mark-Jason Dominus wrote:
>
> >The perl 5 -> perl 6 translator should [recursively handle eval]
>
> Blech, no. eval should stay eval. People are responsible for generating
> Perl6 compatible code, if they construct code as strings on the fly.
I would disagree. If I'm using a program to translate my code
from one version of Perl to another, I don't want to have to go in and
hand-fix (possibly large) sections of it...it should just _work_. I'm
with MJD on this one.
Dave
