On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 06:04:41PM -0400, Mark-Jason Dominus wrote:
>
> > seconded by Mark-Jason Dominus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Except that I don't think adding this feature to the existing q{...}
> is a good idea. If I had to vote on your proposal, I would instantaly
> vote against it. I think you should have invented a new operator or a
> pragma or something.
Agreed.
One could for example have a pragma to *really* tag variables
lexically to be expanded within singlequotes. Or for that matter,
*not* to be expanded within doublequotes.
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
# It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
- RFC 226 (v1) Selective interpolation in single quotish... Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 226 (v1) Selective interpolation in singl... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: RFC 226 (v1) Selective interpolation in s... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 226 (v1) Selective interpolation ... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 226 (v1) Selective interpolat... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: RFC 226 (v1) Selective inter... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 226 (v1) Selective inter... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 226 (v1) Selective i... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 226 (v1) Selective i... Brad Hughes
- Re: RFC 226 (v1) Selective i... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 226 (v1) Selective i... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 226 (v1) Selective interpolation in singl... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 226 (v1) Selective interpolation in s... Brad Hughes
