On 10 Sep 2000 00:33:43 -0400, Chaim Frenkel wrote: >PS> Yes, please. I view the flattening of lists as a feature, not a bug, and >PS> it has made Perl a lot easier to understand IMHO. > >I view it as a mis-feature. I'm sorry to disagree. But flattening of argument lists is one of those things that make Perl, Perl. Change it, and it's not Perl anymore. There are hundreds of other (free) languages out there. Take your pick. >One is unable to return multiple arrays, >or to pass through multiple arrays without resorting to messy extra >punctuation characters. You can pass and return references. The thing gets quite a bit faster in the process, too. If only Perl had a neater way to make aliases to the arguments passed ( *ary = shift; looks very messy)... -- Bart.
- Multiple for loop variables Peter Scott
- Beefier prototypes (was Re: Multiple for loop var... John Porter
- Re: Beefier prototypes (was Re: Multiple for ... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Beefier prototypes (was Re: Multiple ... John Porter
- Re: Beefier prototypes (was Re: Multi... Peter Scott
- Re: Beefier prototypes (was Re: ... John Porter
- Re: Beefier prototypes (was ... Peter Scott
- Re: Beefier prototypes (was Re: ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Beefier prototypes (was ... Bart Lateur
- Re: Beefier prototypes (... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Beefier prototypes (... Bart Lateur
- Re: Beefier prototypes (... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Beefier prototypes (... Bart Lateur
- Re: Beefier prototypes (... Tom Christiansen
- Re: Beefier prototypes (was Re: Multiple for ... John Porter
- Re: Beefier prototypes (was Re: Multiple for ... Damian Conway
- Re: Beefier prototypes (was Re: Multiple ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Beefier prototypes (was Re: Multiple ... Damian Conway
- Re: Beefier prototypes (was Re: Multi... Chaim Frenkel