>Well, it only does this if it's not something like 'split', then! Yes, it does "do it" with split. split is defined to do what it does, how it does it. *This* is the kind of senseless harping that annoys me, Nathan. > So it's not 100% consistent. Wrong: It's 100% consistent with the documentation. And even so, so what? Nothing in Perl is, especially if you invent your own imagined consistencies without reading the documentation. >My point was whether or not this is important enough to be preserved? Yes. --tom
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword to force lis... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword to forc... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword to ... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword to ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword... Tom Christiansen
- Change "($one, $two)=" behav... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Change "($one, $two)=&qu... Tom Christiansen
- Re: Change "($one, $two)=&qu... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Change "($one, $two)=&qu... Tom Christiansen
- Re: Change "($one, $two)=&qu... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Change "($one, $two)=&qu... Tom Hughes
- Re: Change "($one, $two)=&qu... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Change "($one, $two)=&qu... Damian Conway
- Re: Change "($one, $two)=&qu... Tom Christiansen
- Re: Change "($one, $two)=&qu... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Change "($one, $two)=&qu... Peter Scott
- Re: Change "($one, $two)=&qu... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Change "($one, $two)=&qu... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword to ... Randal L. Schwartz