"David L. Nicol" wrote: > > No, that would be > > dog $spot; No, it wouldn't: $r = new CGI; # CGI->new See? > You can have your general consensus, I'm not in his army. Well, unfortunately I think you're doomed to fail then. You're forcing constraints on yourself that Perl cannot fulfill, and which I can't see Larry approving. I really don't want to argue about this trivial point anymore. my($.02) is that your ideas are great, but if you want any realistic chance of getting them into Perl 6, then you have to make the syntax look like Perl. -Nate
- the C JIT David L. Nicol
- Re: the C JIT David Corbin
- Re: the C JIT David L. Nicol
- Re: the C JIT Sam Tregar
- RE: the C JIT David Olbersen
- Re: the C JIT David L. Nicol
- Re: the C JIT Nathan Wiger
- Re: the C JIT David L. Nicol
- Re: the C JIT Nathan Wiger
- Re: the C JIT David L. Nicol
- Re: the C JIT Nathan Wiger
- Re: the C JIT David L. Nicol
- Re: the C JIT Nathan Wiger
- Re: the C JIT David L. Nicol
- Re: the C JIT Nathan Wiger
- we already have barewords as ... David L. Nicol
- Re: we already have barewords... John Porter
- Re: we already have barewords... David L. Nicol
- Re: we already have barewords... David L. Nicol
- Re: we already have barewords... John Porter
- Re: the C JIT Sam Tregar