On Fri, 1 Sep 2000 08:33:24 -0400 (EDT), Eric Roode wrote: >For that matter, let's drop chomp(), eh? I already proposed that. Benchmarks show that reading a file with explicit chomp() is easily 20% slower than reading the same file with implicit chomp(), through the -l command line switch. The problem is that reappending the newline at the end of the string, for example through use of $\, is pretty slow, too. -- Bart.
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Buddha Buck
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Tom Christiansen
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Tom Christiansen
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Eric Roode
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Tom Christiansen
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Bart Lateur
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Eric Roode
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Tom Christiansen
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Bart Lateur
- Re: Proposal: chop() dropped Tom Christiansen