Tom Christiansen writes:
> But %hash->BUCKET_USE() should return what's currently there.
Do you really use this information? Really? I have no objection
to supplying a way to discover it, but this might even be in an
external module rather than built into the language given how rarely
it's used.
> And a simple boolean (read: don't care) use shouldn't waste time
> looking for keys, really, but should be internally optimized to do
> the current reasonable thing. Which your suggestion would also
> boil down to, but for efficiency, this should be pre-boiled.
Yes. I'll put that into the RFC.
Nat
