At 02:25 PM 8/24/00 -0400, Chaim Frenkel wrote: >But > >($foo, $baz, @bar) = (1,(2,3),4) # $foo = 1 $baz=2, @bar=(3,4) > >Actually, looking at it like that makes it an ugly situation. The 'new' >expectation would be to have it become > # $foo=1 $baz=2 @bar=(4) Wouldn't that be $baz = 3, since the middle list would be taken in scalar context? Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to large function return... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to large function r... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to large functi... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to large fu... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to larg... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to larg... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolution to... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 127 (v1) Sane resolutio... Glenn Linderman