Tom Christiansen writes: > If the goal is to make Perl parsable by emacs, might as well just > say that. That's not my goal. Damian's Text::Balanced does a pretty good job of tokenizing Perl as it is. / by itself requires a lot of lookahead, and it's still a guess. Being able to have any programming language able to manipulate Perl programs is a common sense Good Thing. In particular, being able to manipulate the text of a Perl program means you can do analyses and preprocessing. If you say "oh, just use O:: and B::" then you force me to parse the program, suffering the injustices of the optimizer, before I can get my code back. Look at how B::Deparse struggles now. I don't want to struggle. Nat
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on matches, even w... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on matches, e... Stephen P. Potter
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on matche... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on ma... Carl Johan Berglund
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on matche... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on ma... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m o... John Porter
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m o... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m o... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m o... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m o... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m o... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m o... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m o... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m o... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m o... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m o... John Porter
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m o... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m o... John Porter
- New match and subst replacements for ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: New match and subst replacements ... Randy J. Ray