On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Nathan Torkington wrote: > You'd obviously want to have a module that collected together your > favourite new operators. But if they were lexically scoped, they'd > be lexically scoped to the module they were defined in, i.e. your > collection rather than your main program. We're going to have to > think of a way to consistently say "do this in my caller's lexical > scope" without it becoming a nasty upvar hell. Not that it adds much information, but this is the lament of RFC 40. -- Bryan C. Warnock ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp operators Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp operato... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp operato... Kevin Walker
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp ope... Nathan Torkington
- Upscope (was Re: RFC 143) John Porter
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp operato... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp ope... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring e... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp ope... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp... Glenn Linderman
- infix functions David L. Nicol