At 10:35 AM 8/19/00 +1000, Damian Conway wrote: >However, for Perl 6 I'd really like to see run-time access to the >Real Tokenizer (tm): > > use tokenizer; > > my $tree = tokenizer( $sourcecode ); > >This would be dead handy for building source-code filtering modules, >rather than relying on the pseudo-parsing tricks we're currently >forced to use. Well, sure. You couldn't write an optimizer, bytecode compiler, or bytecode execution engine in perl if you couldn't do that... :) Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFCs?) David L. Nicol
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFC... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFC... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFC... skud
- Re: RFCs (Re: Ideas that need RFC... John Porter
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Decklin Foster
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Steve Fink
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Damian Conway
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Larry Wall
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? David Corbin
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Ken Fox
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Joe McMahon
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Larry Wall
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Nathan Torkington
- Re: Ideas that need RFCs? Damian Conway