--On 23.08.2000 4:31 Uhr +0000 Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote:
> The calling syntaces of m()/s() should be consistent with other forms of
> function call; this should be achieved not by eliminating the traditional
> C<//> form from m()/s(), but by allowing any function to be called with
> C<//>.
I'm not so sure what the advantage of that approach is except that you
could overload m and s (which could also be added to use overload)?
To me, this looks as if this probably has lots of potential for perl poetry
but not for programming...
--
Markus Peter - SPiN GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
