John Porter wrote: > [to you only, as this thread is now distinctly off-topic for perl6-language] Well, as Peter pointed out, I managed to utterly mis-edit my headers. And now I can't think of an appropriate expletive to express how I feel about it. Guess I'm just glad what I wrote wasn't really *personal* in any way... -- John Porter
- Re: functions that deal with hash should be more libera John Porter
- Re: functions that deal with hash should be more li... Nathan Torkington
- Re: functions that deal with hash should be more li... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: functions that deal with hash should be more li... Tom Christiansen
- Re: functions that deal with hash should be more li... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: functions that deal with hash should be more li... Tom Christiansen
- Re: functions that deal with hash should be more li... Nathan Torkington
- Re: functions that deal with hash should be more li... John Porter
- Re: functions that deal with hash should be more li... Buddha Buck
- Re: functions that deal with hash should be more li... John Porter
- Re: functions that deal with hash should be more li... John Porter
- Re: functions that deal with hash should be more li... Tom Christiansen
- Re: functions that deal with hash should be more li... Tom Christiansen
- Re: functions that deal with hash should be more li... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: functions that deal with hash should be more li... John Porter
- Re: functions that deal with hash should be more li... Casey R. Tweten