Damian Conway wrote:
>
> Tom's opcode dumping functionality could, in principle, be added to
> Data::Dumper as it stands.
>
> My proposal was merely that C<&Data::Dumper::Dumper> body-snatch C<dump>.
But that's a crummy name for it, unix legacy not withstanding.
Is someone working on an RFC? IIRC, it would propose that the entire
state of the interpreter can be marshalled and unmarshalled, providing
both a checkpointing capability and code mobility.
Optionally the marshall will include only the explicitly given structures
(subroutines, variables); or perhaps only a selected subset of interpreter
state (code, data).
--
John Porter
We're building the house of the future together.
