[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Midnight, Jan 1, 2000, Greenwich time > > seems like a good candidate. <http://www.naggum.no/lugm-time.html> have found 2000-03-01 to be a good epoch. It makes yyyy-mm-dd decoding and leap year calculations cheaper/simpler as it is the closest start of a new 400 year leap-year cycle. Regards, Gisle
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain int... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain interna... skud
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Modifie... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Mod... Tim Jenness
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Modified Jul... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Modified Jul... J. David Blackstone
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Modified Jul... J. David Blackstone
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Modified Jul... GregLondon
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Modifie... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Modifie... Gisle Aas
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Modifie... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Modified Jul... GregLondon