In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think I'd snag a date after the last western country went Julian, just to > avoid some of the less fun time conversion issues. (How long ago Jan 1, > 1690 was depends on what country you're in) I think you mean Gregorian, not Julian. If that's going to be your requirement then you need to pick a date in the 20th century I think as IIRC Russia didn't go Gregorian until then... Tom -- Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.compton.nu/ ...I haven't had sex in so long, I forget who gets tied up!
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain interna... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain interna... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain interna... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain interna... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain interna... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain interna... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain interna... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain interna... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain interna... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain interna... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain interna... Tom Hughes
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain interna... Tim Bunce
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain interna... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain interna... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain interna... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain interna... Tim Jenness
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain interna... Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain interna... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal tim... skud
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Modified Jul... Nick Ing-Simmons