Larry Wall wrote: > > Yes, but has anyone pointed out that > > @out = sort ^b cmp ^a, @in; > > won't do what people will certainly think it ought to? > > Larry Well, this will hopefully be moot. I was inspired by discussion here, my own disdain, and p5p strict issues to write an RFC simply titled "sort-specific $a and $b must die". Judging by some posts I've read, I think Jarkko and some others might agree with me a little here. :-) Before anyone flares up, it'll be out next Wed. It's got a couple alternatives which are just as short, but solve several problems. Just thought I'd mention it here because it's relevant. -Nate
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduc... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduc... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduc... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduc... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduc... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 76 (v1) Builtin: reduce Glenn Linderman