> Mmm... yummy... And placeholder names seem to be getting a real > role in life too! I wonder if hashes used as HOF arguments in > general should use placeholder names to fill in their arguments > from the corresponding hash elements. That would be even yummier! Personally I think an explicit keyword like C<with> is better, because it's more general. Damian
- Re: implied pascal-like &quo... Dave Storrs
- Re: implied pascal-like &quo... Brian Wheeler
- Re: implied pascal-like &quo... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: implied pascal-like &quo... Dave Storrs
- Re: implied pascal-like &quo... Ken Fox
- Re: implied pascal-like &quo... Jeremy Howard
- Re: implied pascal-like &quo... David L. Nicol
- Re: implied pascal-like &quo... Ken Fox
- Re: implied pascal-like &quo... Damian Conway
- Re: implied pascal-like &quo... Jeremy Howard
- Re: implied pascal-like &quo... Damian Conway
- Re: implied pascal-like &quo... James Mastros
- Re: implied pascal-like &quo... Damian Conway
- Re: implied pascal-like &quo... Johan Vromans
- Re: command line option: $|++ skud
- Re: command line option: $|++ Chaim Frenkel
- Re: command line option: $|++ Ed Mills
- Re: command line option: $|++ Nathan Wiger
