Dave Storrs wrote:
> On 17 Aug 2000, Johan Vromans wrote:
> > Dave Storrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > 2) "express" should guarantee that, before it creates a variable
> > > names $FOO, it first calls "local" on any existing $FOO
> >
> > Why, if the variable is lexical (see 3)?
>
> D'oh. s{2) .+^}{}
>
> Mismatch between brain and fingers there somewhere, thanks for
> pointing it out.
Huh? They need to be "globals", because the "with" mechanism
is going to have to be able to write them into a symbol table.
You can't do this with lexicals. (Well, maybe that'll be different
in perl6?)
--
John Porter
- Re: Default filehandles(was Re: command line option: $... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Default filehandles(was Re: command line option: $... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Default filehandles(was Re: command line option: $... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Default filehandles(was Re: command line option: $... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Default filehandles(was Re: command line option: $... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Default filehandles(was Re: command line option: $... Peter Scott
- pascal-like "with" was Re: Default filehand... David L. Nicol
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default file... Dave Storrs
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default file... Johan Vromans
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default file... Dave Storrs
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default file... John Porter
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default file... Johan Vromans
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default file... Dave Storrs
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default fileh... Clayton Scott
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default fileh... Dave Storrs
- implied pascal-like "with" or "express&... David L. Nicol
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... Jeremy Howard
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... David L. Nicol
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... David L. Nicol
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... Dave Storrs
