Re: RFC 56 (v2) Optional 2nd argument to C and C

[Dave Storrs]

On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Glenn Linderman wrote:

> > What should happen when the expression given to C<pop()>, or
> > C<shift()> evaluates to a negative number?  I see three options:
[...]
> >
> >         3) C<pop()> would then act as C<shift()> and C<shift()> would
> >            act as C<pop()>
> >
> I like #3 too, does that make a better consensus?

        Can you guess which option I favor?  :>

                        Dave