Nathan Torkington wrote: > John Porter writes: > > foo $= ( bar, quux ); # provide scalar context to both sides > > foo @= ( bar, quux ); # provide list context to both sides > > I assume you've dropped this idea as well, given the argument that you > would be dropping prefix symbols but creating a lot of new operators > to do the same task? Sure. It was just an idea. But who knows, maybe I'll take it up again some day... :-) -- John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line n... Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line n... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line n... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line n... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line n... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line n... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line n... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line n... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... John Barnette
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... John Barnette
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Kai Henningsen
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Mike Pastore
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Nathan Torkington