Damien Neil wrote: > > I'm not saying that Perl's choices are better than everyone else's; > they are, however, Perl's. True enough. > Are you saying that a tied $a should be able to return a list in list > context? I would hope not; this rather seriously breaks the principle > of least surprise. Oops! I misread what you wrote. -- John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line n... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line n... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... Andy Wardley
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Jon Ericson