"J. David Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I find the standard prefix symbols so intuitive I find it hard to > articulate the reasons why I balk at giving them up. It's like > explaining breathing or the ability to distinguish colors. Bravo! What he said! Hear, hear! [FX: Waves order paper in the air] -- Piers
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line n... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line n... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% J. David Blackstone
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Mike Pastore
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - le... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get ... Mike Pastore
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 109 (v1) Less line noise - let's get rid of @% Syloke Soong