>>>>> "NT" == Nathan Torkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: NT> Chaim Frenkel writes: >> Why? What is the gain? Perl only runs on the local machine. NT> Epoch seconds are a convenient representation for dates and times. NT> Varying epochs make it an unreliable representation when data are NT> shared. A consistent epoch would fix this. Sorry, I don't buy that. Not every program will be perl. Plus you are assuming that epoch seconds are good everywhere. And even if it were why should any other program use the same epoch. The only valid interchange would be to specify the date unambiguously, for example the ISO <mumble, help me Jarkko> YYYYMMDDHHMMSS.fff <chaim> -- Chaim Frenkel Nonlinear Knowledge, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-718-236-0183
- Re: RFC 99 (v2) Standardize ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 99 (v2) Standardize ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 99 (v2) Standardize ALL ... Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 99 (v2) Standardize ALL Perl platforms on... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 99 (v2) Standardize ALL Perl platform... Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC 99 (v2) Standardize ALL Perl plat... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 99 (v2) Standardize ALL Perl ... Stephen P. Potter
- Re: RFC 99 (v2) Standardize ALL ... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 99 (v2) Standardize ALL Perl plat... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 99 (v2) Standardize ALL Perl platform... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 99 (v2) Standardize ALL Perl plat... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 99 (v2) Standardize ALL Perl plat... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 99 (v2) Standardize ALL Perl ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 99 (v2) Standardize ALL Perl plat... skud
- Re: RFC 99 (v2) Standardize ALL Perl plat... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 99 (v2) Standardize ALL Perl platforms on UNIX... skud
- RE: RFC 99 (v2) Standardize ALL Perl platforms on UNIX... Henrik Tougaard