> Just to make sure some opposition is heard: I've always thought of > "throw" as very silly word. To me, a program is much like a maze, a > multilevel walk in an old castle. There are unexpected trapdoors, but as > long as they stay closed, you can simply continue. If such a trapdoor > open, you fall through, someimes through several floors, until somewhere > you encounter a safety net: you were caught. You can continue from > there. If there was no safety net, you keep falling, well, into the > water, out of the castle (er, "program".) Hmmm...trip() and trap()? fail() and deal()? > An error is not a ball. > > -- > Bart. -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
- Re: RFC 78 (v1) Improved Module Versioning And Searchi... Bennett Todd
- Re: RFC 78 (v1) Improved Module Versioning And Searchi... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 78 (v1) Improved Module Versioning And Searchi... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 78 (v1) Improved Module Versioning And Searchi... Dan Sugalski
- errors and their keywords and where catch can return t... David L. Nicol
- Re: errors and their keywords and where catch can retu... Peter Scott
- Re: errors and their keywords and where catch can retu... Dan Sugalski
- English language basis for "throw" David L. Nicol
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Bart Lateur
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Dan Sugalski
- Re: English language basis for "throw" John Porter
- Re: English language basis for "throw" John Porter
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Nathan Torkington
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Peter Scott
- Re: English language basis for "throw" John Porter
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Stephen P. Potter
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Tony Olekshy
- Re: English language basis for "throw" John Porter
- Re: English language basis for "throw" John Porter