At 01:48 PM 8/14/00 -0500, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > > How 'bout 100ns ticks from base date, stored in a 64-bit number? That > >We are going to have quads supported on all platforms, then? With >software emulation of our own if nothing else is available? I wouldn't >object, mind... I'd like to provide ints of that size, yes. Whether they're native (on, say, Alphas or SPARCs), faked by the compiler, or faked by perl is an open question, but I would like them in. This might end up in BigInt format instead of plain int if the platform integers are too small, but that's OK, I think. Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Modified Julian ... Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Modifie... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in Mod... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal tim... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal time in... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain internal tim... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain interna... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain int... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain... Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain... Tim Jenness
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain... Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 99 (v1) Maintain... Nathan Wiger