At 04:00 AM 8/5/00 +1000, Damian Conway wrote:
> > It definitely is, since formats do things that can't be done in modules.
>
>Such as???
Well, the easy binding of variables for later use. When one declares a
format, variables in it are saved for later use without needing refs.
Formats are sort of like a quote where the variables are referenced rather
than interpolated when defined, with the values pulled (and possibly
altered) when the quote is used.
> > If they yank formats out (which is just dandy by me) that means
> > that some means of providing format's functionality needs has to
> > be designed in.
>
>I'm working on it.
:) I promised Kirrily that I'd race you in the RFC count...
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 skud
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Uri Guttman
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl6 Prject Plan / Roadmap H.Merijn Brand
- Re: Perl6 Prject Plan / Roadmap Dan Sugalski
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Nathan Wiger
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Damian Conway
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 200... Bart Lateur
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th Augus... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 200... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Damian Conway
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Damian Conway
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Steve Simmons
