At 04:00 AM 8/5/00 +1000, Damian Conway wrote: > > It definitely is, since formats do things that can't be done in modules. > >Such as??? Well, the easy binding of variables for later use. When one declares a format, variables in it are saved for later use without needing refs. Formats are sort of like a quote where the variables are referenced rather than interpolated when defined, with the values pulled (and possibly altered) when the quote is used. > > If they yank formats out (which is just dandy by me) that means > > that some means of providing format's functionality needs has to > > be designed in. > >I'm working on it. :) I promised Kirrily that I'd race you in the RFC count... Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 skud
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Uri Guttman
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl6 Prject Plan / Roadmap H.Merijn Brand
- Re: Perl6 Prject Plan / Roadmap Dan Sugalski
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Nathan Wiger
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Damian Conway
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 200... Bart Lateur
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th Augus... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 200... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Damian Conway
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Damian Conway
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Steve Simmons