Re: RFC 90 (v1) Builtins: zip() and unzip()

[iain truskett]

* Jeremy Howard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [13 Aug 2000 17:28]:
[...]
> Personally, I like 'weave' rather than 'zip'. I'm happy with 'unweave'
> too--although I'm still unsure about that one...

Weave is too much like Knuth's tangle and weave pair of programs for his
WEB idea. *sigh* All the good names are taken =)

> BTW, I've seen no discussion of RFC 82 (Make operators behave
> consistently in a list context), so I'm not sure what to do with it...
> Is that because everyone thinks it's great, or that it's stupid, or
> just that no-one's got any idea what I'm trying to say?

I glanced through it and thought it seemed fine. If people think
something is stupid, they'll email. If people want something changed,
they'll email. If something is good, they won't =)



cheers,
-- 
iain truskett, aka Koschei.                    <http://eh.org/~koschei/>
      Emacs is a nice OS - but it lacks a good text editor.
      That's why I am using Vim.  -- Anonymous.