> Still, your matrix/unmatrix idea is intruiging... I'd be interested to see > this fleshed out further (particularly to n-dimensional tensors, which is > where I find generic functions hard to specify)... What the heck! I'll try to produce something on it this weekend. By Monday for sure. If anyone has any pre-input, please send it to me privately. Thanks. -Nate
- RFC 91 (v1) Builtin: partition Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 91 (v1) Builtin: partition Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 91 (v1) Builtin: partition Buddha Buck
- Re: RFC 91 (v1) Builtin: partition Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 91 (v1) Builtin: partition Mike Pastore
- Re: RFC 91 (v1) Builtin: partition Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 91 (v1) Builtin: partiti... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 91 (v1) Builtin: partition Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 91 (v1) Builtin: partition Buddha Buck
- Re: matrices : RFC 91 (v1) Builtin: partition raptor
- Re: RFC 91 (v1) Builtin: partition Stephen P. Potter
- Re: RFC 91 (v1) Builtin: partition Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 91 (v1) Builtin: partition Stephen P. Potter
- Re: RFC 91 (v1) Builtin: partition Jeremy Howard