> Are the two values of a pair restricted in anyway? All your examples > were scalar. Yes. The two components must be scalars. The key is stringified iff it's a bareword. Otherwise no restrictions. > What about a plural whatzit or a reference to a plural > whatzit? References are fine. Arrays and hashes are not. Damian
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma) with =&... Mike Pastore
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma) with =&... Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma) with =&... Brad Hughes
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma) with =&... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma) wi... Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma) wi... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma) wi... John Porter
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma) with =&... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma) with =&... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma) wi... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying c... Ken Fox
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifyi... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma) with =&... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma) wi... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma) wi... Mark Cogan
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma) with =&... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 84 (v1) Replace => (stringifying comma) wi... Glenn Linderman