> I think this is a bit heavy-weight for core. Agreed. General-purpose timezone support is scheduled for a swift and painless death in the next version of RFC 48. Only the local timezone and GMT will be included in the RFC, same as now. I wish it could happen, but too many people have brought up concerns that I feel are extremely legitimate "show-stoppers". -Nate
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace localtime() and gmtime... Matt Sergeant
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace localtime() and g... Nathan Wiger
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace localtime() a... Damien Neil
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace localtime... Nathan Wiger
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace localtime... Bart Lateur
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace local... John Tobey
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Russ Allbery
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Repl... John Tobey
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) ... Russ Allbery
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) ... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) ... Bart Lateur
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) ... Russ Allbery
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) ... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) ... Bart Lateur
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) ... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) ... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) ... Russ Allbery
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) ... Peter Scott
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) ... Russ Allbery