Hildo Biersma wrote: > > Bit dangerous there - the string-to-ref operator is left out for a > purpose. > - Would you really want the ref-counting system / the GC system to > scan strings? > - Would like like the effects of pointer arithmetic that > the ref-tostring, edit-string, string-to-ref sequence allows? Um, no... )-: -- John Porter
- Re: RFC 48 (v2) Objects should have builtin stringifyi... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 48 (v2) Objects should have builtin strin... John Porter
- Re: RFC 48 (v2) Objects should have builtin s... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 48 (v2) Objects should have built... John Porter
- Re: RFC 48 (v2) Objects should have builtin stringifyi... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 48 (v2) Objects should have builtin strin... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 48 (v2) Objects should have builtin strin... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 48 (v2) Objects should have builtin s... John Porter
- Re: RFC 48 (v2) Objects should have built... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 48 (v2) Objects should have built... Hildo Biersma
- Re: RFC 48 (v2) Objects should have b... John Porter
- Re: RFC 48 (v2) Objects should have built... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 48 (v2) Objects should have builtin s... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 48 (v2) Objects should have built... Michael Fowler