On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 09:50:27PM +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote: > All I can say to that is, ugh! I don't want to see Perl6 be so > fundamentally different to perl5 that I have to translate every single > script. I want some better stuff, but a new language is not what I'm > looking for. All of your programs may need translating anyway. They just might be translated on-the-fly by perl6 and all you'd have to do is add a command line switch or add "use Perl5;" or maybe absolutely nothing at all. -Scott -- Jonathan Scott Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Bart Lateur
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Russ Allbery
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Peter Scott
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace ... Russ Allbery
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace localtime() and gmtime... Matt Sergeant
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace localtime() and g... John Porter
- Re: AGAINST RFC 48 (v1) Replace localtime() a... Uri Guttman
- Jonathan Scott Duff