Thus it was written in the epistle of Jonathan Scott Duff, > On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 01:56:12PM -0400, Uri Guttman wrote: > > a couple of ideas. one, i proposed we keep a global $/ and $\ for > > default use by handles which haven't set their own. > > Rather than having global $/ and $\, each filehandle has their's > defaulted to something reasonable. I think that the point of the global $/ and $\ was to define "reasonable." Ted -- Ted Ashton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), Info Sys, Southern Adventist University ========================================================== A Mathematician is a machine for turning coffee into theorems. -- Erdos, Paul ========================================================== Deep thoughts to be found at http://www.southern.edu/~ashted
- Re: RFC 58 (v1) C<chomp()> changes. John Porter
- Re: RFC 58 (v1) C<chomp()> changes. Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 58 (v1) C<chomp()> changes. John Porter
- Re: RFC 58 (v1) C<chomp()> changes. Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 58 (v1) C<chomp()> changes. Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 58 (v1) C<chomp()> changes. Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 58 (v1) C<chomp()> changes. Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 58 (v1) C<chomp()> changes. Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 58 (v1) C<chomp()> changes. Uri Guttman
- Re: RFC 58 (v1) C<chomp()> changes. Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 58 (v1) C<chomp()> changes. Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC 58 (v1) C<chomp()> changes. Uri Guttman
- Re: RFC 58 (v1) C<chomp()> changes. Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 58 (v1) C<chomp()> changes. Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC 58 (v1) C<chomp()> changes. Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 58 (v1) C<chomp()> changes. Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 58 (v1) C<chomp()> changes. Mike Pastore
- Re: RFC 58 (v1) C<chomp()> changes. Michael Mathews
- Re: RFC 58 (v1) C<chomp()> changes. Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 58 (v1) C<chomp()> changes. John Porter
- Re: RFC 58 (v1) C<chomp()> changes. Bart Lateur