At 02:18 PM 8/8/00 +0000, Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote: >This and other RFCs are available on the web at > http://dev.perl.org/rfc/ > >=head1 TITLE > >Objects should have builtin stringifying STRING method > >=head1 VERSION > > Maintainer: Nathan Wiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 06 Aug 2000 > Version: 2 > Status: Developing > Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Number: 48 Is this an update to the original RFC 48 with a new title? Or is it a new RFC mis-numbered? Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- RFC 48 (v2) Objects should have builtin stringifying Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 48 (v2) Objects should have builtin strin... Michael Mathews
- Re: RFC 48 (v2) Objects should have builtin s... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 48 (v2) Objects should have builtin strin... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 48 (v2) Objects should have builtin s... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 48 (v2) Objects should have builtin strin... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 48 (v2) Objects should have builtin s... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 48 (v2) Objects should have built... John Porter
- Re: RFC 48 (v2) Objects should have b... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 48 (v2) Objects should h... John Porter
- Re: RFC 48 (v2) Objects should have builtin s... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 48 (v2) Objects should have built... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 48 (v2) Objects should have built... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 48 (v2) Objects should have b... John Porter