On Mon, 7 Aug 2000 13:52:09 -0400, John Porter wrote: >Right, VAX is strictly little-endian. >I.e. the address of a *word is the address of its least significant byte. >(That's little-endian, isn't it?) Right. Why you people don't call it "Intel" vs. "Motorola", like the rest of the civilised world, I don't know. ;-) See the TIFF spec, for example. Er, in case you were in any doubt: Motorola (from the 68k processors) is BigEndian, Intel (x86) is LittleEndian. TIFF marks the files with either "MM" or "II". Sorry for the sidetracking. But IMO, it's not necessary for everybody to go and look this up independently. -- Bart.
- DRAFT RFC: Enhanced Pack/Unpack Edwin Wiles
- Re: DRAFT RFC: Enhanced Pack/Unpack Dominic Dunlop
- Re: DRAFT RFC: Enhanced Pack/Unpack Glenn Linderman
- Re: DRAFT RFC: Enhanced Pack/Unpack Bart Lateur
- Re: DRAFT RFC: Enhanced Pack/Unpack Glenn Linderman
- Re: DRAFT RFC: Enhanced Pack/Unpack Edwin Wiles
- Re: DRAFT RFC: Enhanced Pack/Unpack Glenn Linderman
- Re: DRAFT RFC: Enhanced Pack/Unpack Tom Hughes
- Re: DRAFT RFC: Enhanced Pack/Unpack Glenn Linderman
- Re: DRAFT RFC: Enhanced Pack/Unpack John Porter
- Re: DRAFT RFC: Enhanced Pack/Unp... Bart Lateur
- Re: DRAFT RFC: Enhanced Pack... Dan Sugalski
- Re: DRAFT RFC: Enhanced Pack/Unpack Tom Hughes
- Re: DRAFT RFC: Enhanced Pack/Unp... Dan Sugalski